Modeling the gas infrastructure decorbonization process using the example of the Severnaya compressor station

  • Svyatoslav E. Golovan Joint-stock company “New Start”, Moscow, Russia; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “N.E. Bauman Moscow State Technical University (National Research University)”, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3562-0336
  • Andrey V. Stepanov Joint-stock company “New Start”, Moscow, Russia; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “N.E. Bauman Moscow State Technical University (National Research University)”, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2502-6876
  • Oksana V. Shapovalova Joint-stock company “New Start” Moscow, Russia; N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-7793
  • Boris V. Akhremenkov Joint-stock company “New Start”, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1160-0831
  • Anna A. Petrova Joint-stock company “New Start” Moscow, Russia; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation”, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6721-4803
Keywords: methane-hydrogen mixtures, decarbonization, steam methane reforming, CO₂ emission reduction, energy efficiency, investment assessment, economic feasibility.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the potential for improving the economic and environmental efficiency of gas trunkline transportation by introducing methane-hydrogen mixtures with an H2 content of up to 20%, using the example of a pilot project to construct an SMR unit with CCUS at PJSC Gazprom's Severnaya compressor station. The study covers the technical and economic aspects of production, safety, infrastructure integration, and the efficiency of using methane-hydrogen mixtures in the gas transmission system. Particular attention is paid to assessing the impact of the mixture on gas transmission system equipment, industrial installations, and household appliances, as well as calculating the economic feasibility of the project, taking into account potential government support.

References

Government of the Russian Federation. (2020, June 9). Order No. 1523-r: On approval of the Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2035 (accessed 21.02 2025). (in Russ.).

KS “Severnaya”. (2021). Reconstruction has begun. https://spb-tr.gazprom.ru/d/journal/37/55/1-(47)-mart-2021_.pdf (accessed 21.02 2025). (in Russ.).

Lebedev, V. A., Gorina, O. L. (2021). Energy efficiency of hydrogen utilization technologies at thermal power plants. In Developing the energy agenda of the future. ETU “LETI”, 63–68. (in Russ.).

Gazprom. (2025). Yuzhno-Russkoye field. https://www.gazprom.ru/projects/yuzhno-russkoye/ (accessed 21.02 2025). (in Russ.).

Lisin, E. M., Parshina, A. S., Zameshaeva, I. S., & Musaeva, D. E. (2022). Technical and economic aspects of hydrogen production and utilization at thermal power plants. Bulletin of KSPEU, 2(54), 120–133. (in Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehniko-ekonomicheskie-aspekty-proizvodstva-i-ispolzovaniya-vodoroda-na-teplovyh-elektrostantsiyah

Alfayaad, A. G. Kh., Valiev, D. Z., Kemalov, R. A., & Kemalov, A. F. (2023). Modeling of a steam methane reforming unit with hydrogen extraction. Kazan Federal University, 20–26. (in Russ.).

Zanina, A. A., Stepanov, A. V., Sokolov, I. V., Shapovalova, O. V., & Lisov, A. A. (2025). Assessment of prospects and economic feasibility of various hydrogen production methods for use in the rocket and space industry. Space Economics, 3(13), 22–40. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.48612/agat/space_economics/2025.04.13.03.

Osiptsov, A., Gaida, I., Grushevenko, E., & Kapitonov, S. (2022). Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies, Skoltech, 18–28. (in Russ.) https://back.skoltech.ru/storage/app/media/archive/2022/11/CCUS-Skolteh-2022-11-10.pdf.

Liang, Z., Browne, S., Deiterding, R., & Shepherd, J. E. (2007). Detonation front structure and the competition for radicals. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31(2), 2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.244.

Huzayyin, A.S., Moneib, H.A., Shehatta, M.S., & Attia, A.M.A. (2008). Laminar burning velocity and explosion index of LPG–air and propane–air mixtures. Fuel, 87(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.001.

Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., Wei, L., Zhang, J., & Law, C. K. (2012). Experimental and modeling study on ignition delays of lean mixtures of methane, hydrogen, oxygen, and argon at elevated pressures. Combustion and flame, 159(3), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.09.010.

Process Insights, Inc. (2021). COSA 9610: Real Time Gas Analyzers. COSA Xentaur. https://www.process-insights.com/products-3/calorimeters-2/9610cxc/ (accessed October 28, 2025).

Warnatz, J., Maas, U., & Dibble, R. W. (2006). Combustion: physical and chemical fundamentals, modeling and simulation, experiments, pollutant formation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45363-5.

Garcia, A. M., Le Bras, S., & Polifke, W. (2023). Effect of hydrogen addition on the consumption speed of lean premixed laminar methane flames exposed to combined strain and heat loss. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 27(4), 584–604. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368853817_Effect_of_hydrogen_addition_on_the_consumption_speed_of_lean_premixed_laminar_methane_flames_exposed_to_combined_strain_and_heat_loss.

Jeroen B.W. Kok, S. van der Wal. (1996). Mixing in T-junctions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 20(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(95)00151-9.

COSA Xentaur. (2021). COSA 9610. https://www.process-insights.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Process-Insights_9610_DS_v24nbp.pdf (accessed October 28, 2025).

Global Power. (2025). GPS Taurus 60 Mobile Power Unit. https://www.globalpwr.com/wp-content/uploads/cut-sheets/gps-taurus60-mobile-power-unit.pdf (accessed November 13, 2025)

Kitaev, S. V., Farukhshina, R. R., Muratova, V. I., Darsalia, N. M. (2022). Investigation of gas turbine engine operation on methane–hydrogen mixture for natural gas trunk transport. Transport and Storage of Petroleum Products, 5–6. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/0131-4270-2022-5-6-50-53.

Fedorova, E. B., & Yushin, A. O. (2022). Influence of hydrogen injected into natural gas stream on operation of gas transmission system equipment. Vesti gazovoy nauki, 2(51). (in Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-vodoroda-vnesennogo-v-potok-prirodnogo-gaza-na-rabotu-oborudovaniya-gazotransportnoy-sistemy.

ZTZ. (2025). Mainline gas pipes. https://ztz.ru/products/useful-informations/magistralnye-gazovye-truby/ (accessed November 10, 2025). (in Russ.)

Lavrova, S. V., & Shestakov, R. A. (2022). Pumping of methane–hydrogen mixture: Study of pressure distribution change along the pipeline. Neftegaz.RU, 12(132). (in Russ.) https://magazine.neftegaz.ru/articles/transportirovka/761026-perekachka-metano-vodorodnoy-smesi-issledovanie-izmeneniya-raspredeleniya-davleniya-po-dline-gazopro/.

Maryin, G. E., Osipov, B. M., Akhmetshin, A. R., & Savina, M. V. (2021). Addition of hydrogen to fuel gas to increase energy characteristics of gas turbine installations. Vestnik IrGTU, 3(158) (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2021-3-342-355.

Khakimov, R. R., & Bakirov, F. G. (2022). Energy gas turbine installations on methane–hydrogen fuel. Vestnik UGATU, 4(98), 84–98. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54708/19926502_2022_264984.

Kippers, M., De Laat, J., & Hermkens, R. (2012). A small step into the hydrogen future. Gas of Russia, (1), 28–36. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20370541 (in Russ.).

Nastich, S. Yu. (2022). Assessment of the impact of hydrogen-containing gas on metal properties and SCC defects of main pipelines. In VI International Scientific and Practical Seminar “Improving the Reliability of Trunk Gas Pipelines Subject to Stress Corrosion Cracking”. Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC. (in Russ.). https://vniigaz.gazprom.ru/events/2022/krn-2022/.

Grant, B. M., Francis, E. M., Da Fonseca, J. Q., Daymond, M. R., & Preuss, M. (2012). Deformation behaviour of an advanced nickel-based superalloy studied by neutron diffraction and electron microscopy. Acta materialia, 60(19), 6829‒6841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.005.

Lynch, Stan. “Hydrogen embrittlement phenomena and mechanisms” Corrosion Reviews, 30(3-4), 2012, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2012-0502.

Ohaeri, E., Eduok, U., & Szpunar, J. (2018). Hydrogen related degradation in pipeline steel: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(31), 14584‒14617. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319918318767.

Yu, H., Díaz, A., Lu, X., Sun, B., Ding, Y., Koyama, M., ... & Zhang, Z. (2024). Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge ‒ comprehensive review and future directions. Chemical Reviews, 124(10), 6271–6392. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00624

Morteza Dadfarnia, Petros Sofronis, Ian M. Robertson, Brian P. Somerday, Govindarajan Muralidharan, Douglas Stalheim (2006). Micromechanics of hydrogen transport and embrittlement in pipeline steels. Proceedings of the ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2006), Paper No. IMECE2006-13657, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2006-13657.

Mats Bäckman., & Henrik Iskov. (2010). Transport of hydrogen with polyethylene natural gas pipes. In Proceedings of the 15th Plastic Pipes Conference (PPXV). https://plasticpipesconference.com/content/235/272/5c866611afe7f.pdf.

Abramchuk, F. I., Kabanov, A. N., & Maistrenko, G. V. (2009). Influence of hydrogen addition to natural gas on properties of the mixed fuel. Avtomobilny transport, (24). (in Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-dobavki-vodoroda-k-prirodnomu-gazu-na-svoystva-smesevogo-topliva.

Wang, K., Li, F., Zhou, T., & Ao, Y. (2023). Numerical study of combustion and emission characteristics for hydrogen mixed fuel in the methane-fueled gas turbine combustor. Aerospace, 10(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10010072.

GOST 31369-2008. (2008). Natural gas: Calculation of heat of combustion, density, relative density and Wobbe index based on component composition. (in Russ.)

GOST 5542-2022. (2022). Natural gas for industrial and domestic use: Technical conditions. (in Russ.).

EN 483:1999. (1999). Gas-fired central heating boilers: Type “C” boilers with a rated thermal output not exceeding 70 kW.

GOST R 54826-2011. (2011). Gas-fired central heating boilers: Type “C” boilers with a rated thermal output of no more than 70 kW. (in Russ.).

ISO 9969:2016. (2016). Thermoplastics pipes: Determination of ring stiffness.

GOST ISO 9969-2025. (2025). Thermoplastics pipes: Determination of ring stiffness. (in Russ.).

EN 1254:2021. (2021). Copper and copper alloys – Sanitary fittings.

GOST R 52922-2008. (2008). Fittings made of copper and copper alloys for connecting copper pipes by capillary soldering: Technical conditions. (in Russ.).

ISO 8256. (n.d.). Plastics – Determination of impact strength under load.

GOST 34250-2017. (2017). Plastics – Method for determining impact tensile strength. (in Russ.).

GOST R 8.974-2019. (2019). State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements: Gas analysis – Recalculation of gas mixture composition data. (in Russ.).

Ministry of Economic Development of Russia. (2025). Scenario conditions of economic functioning and forecast parameters for 2025–2027. (in Russ.).

RKS Energo. (2025). Prices and tariffs for legal entities. https://www.rks-energo.ru/price_tariff_entitie (accessed 21.02 2025). (in Russ.).

Lenobl Tariffs Portal. (2025). Tariffs for cold water supply for 2025. https://tarif.lenobl.ru/ (accessed 21.02. 2025). (in Russ.).

PeterburgRegionGaz. (2025). Whole sale gas prices effective from July 1, 2025. https://www.peterburgregiongaz.ru/org/gas-prices/ (accessed 21.02 2025). (in Russ.).

Published
2025-12-15
How to Cite
Golovan, S. E., Stepanov, A. V., Shapovalova, O. V., Akhremenkov, B. V., & Petrova, A. A. (2025). Modeling the gas infrastructure decorbonization process using the example of the Severnaya compressor station. Chemical Safety Science, 9(2), 69‒98. https://doi.org/10.25514/CHS.2025.2.29003
Section
Simulation of chemical and ecological processes